John MacArthur's False Claims About Mark 16:9-20 - Part 1
John MacArthur's False Claims About Mark 16:9-20 - Part 2
The Fitting End to Mark’s Gospel (Mark 16:9-20)
Mark 16:9-20 (My Response to John MacArthur's Verdict)
John MacArthur's False Claims About Mark 16:9-20 - Part 3
John MacArthur and the Ending of Mark
Mark 16:9-20 - Grace To You vs. the Evidence
Is Mark 16:9–20 really part of the Bible?
Are there MANY Ending of Mark's Gospel? Analyzing John MacArthur's CLAIMS on Mark 16:9-20 | Part 3
What about the ending of Mark’s Gospel?
The Authenticity Of Mark 16:9-20
Dr White's Perspective on the Longer Ending of Mark
John MacArthur is WRONG about the LONG ENDING of MARK. Analyzing his claims | Part 2
In Mark 16:9-20, Codex Sinaiticus & Codex Vaticanus do not have the long ending - Daniel Wallace
Mark 16:1-20 - Skip Heitzig
In Mark 16:9-20, Scribes wrote a 'longer ending' to New Testament Bible - Bart Ehrman
Frank Turek tells his followers: Mark (16:9-20) is fake but don't worry the bible is still reliable!
Paul Washer on biblical inspiration compared to John MacArthur on Mark 16:9-20
Analyzing JOHN MACARTHUR'S claims on the ENDING OF MARK'S GOSPEL with James Snapp jr. | Part 1
Is Mark 16:9-20 Really Not in the Oldest Manuscripts?
